Drones for Maintenance Inspections

Updated

July 2026

Technology Readiness Level

8 / 9

Challenges Addressed
Aging Infrastructure

Overview

Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS), commonly referred to as drones, are deployed by U.S. electric utilities to inspect overhead transmission and distribution (T&D) infrastructure. The primary function is visual and sensor-based inspection of overhead assets, including transmission towers, conductors, insulators, substations, and related structures, using UAVs equipped with integrated cameras and sensors. This purpose focuses exclusively on data collection, providing utilities with rapid, safe, and scalable visibility across their distribution networks[1].

The system encompasses three integrated components:

  1. the aerial platform itself, typically a multi-rotor or fixed-wing UAV operating under FAA Part 107 visual line-of-sight (VLOS) rules or, on a case-by-case waiver basis, beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS);
  2. onboard sensor packages, including high-resolution RGB cameras, thermal/infrared imagers, multispectral, LiDAR, acoustic detectors, and radio-frequency sensors; and
  3. post-flight data management and analytics software, including AI/computer vision platforms that process raw imagery into actionable maintenance intelligence, integrate findings with utility asset management systems (AMS) and work-order workflows, and manage the enterprise-scale data outputs generated across fleet operations – encompassing data ingestion pipelines, storage architecture, and standardization of file formats, metadata schemas, and naming conventions to enable consistent cross-platform interoperability[2].

Traditional inspection methods, such as ground patrols, bucket trucks, and manned helicopter sorties, are costly, time-consuming, and expose workers to falls, electrocution risk, and aerial hazards. Drones reduce field exposure while providing vantage points ground crews cannot easily obtain, enhancing detection of conductor damage, pole-top equipment degradation, vegetation encroachment, and thermal anomalies[2].

Note on Enterprise Data Management
Drone programs generate diverse data formats across sensors and vendors, and without standardized file structures and metadata conventions, utilities face challenges integrating outputs into existing systems. Data standardization is therefore a foundational prerequisite for realizing the full operational value of a UAS inspection program and should be addressed as part of program design rather than as an afterthought.  

Note on Adjacent Applications
Adjacent applications include vegetation monitoring, clearance measurement for regulatory compliance, poststorm damage assessment, wildfire risk evaluation, and automated GIS data cleanup. These areas share platforms with inspection drones but require distinct workflows and should be evaluated separately. 

Benefits

1

Safety and Worker Risk Reduction

The primary value driver documented by EPRI and ORNL is the removal of workers from hazardous environments. Inspection of high-voltage transmission towers historically required climbers, helicopter sorties, or bucket trucks, involving exposure to energized equipment, fall risk, and extreme weather. Drone-based data collection eliminates the need for personnel to ascend structures or enter energized zones for routine monitoring[1].

2

Cost and Time Efficiency

EPRI documents that drone inspections can be completed faster than ground-based visual inspections even under current VLOS restrictions, and that aerial imagery provides a beneficial perspective for overhead asset condition assessment. EPRI research and Duke Energy UAV trial data report 40-70% labor reductions depending on site type. A major western U.S. utility that deployed drones for Close Visual Inspection (CVI) combined with LiDAR, thermal imaging, and corona detection achieved over $1.1 million in annual savings in a targeted service area, which was subsequently scaled across its wider territory[4].

A separate large California Investor-Owned Utility (IOU) reported $180 million in cumulative savings from its UAS programs, driven primarily by accurate pole condition assessment that avoided unnecessary replacement cycles, and a 25% reduction in vegetation management costs through elimination of unnecessary truck rolls.

3

Data Quality and Predictive Maintenance Enablement

UAVs operating on repeatable, GPS-stabilized flight paths collect standardized imagery across inspection cycles, enabling AI-driven change detection and trend analysis. Critically, automated data capture also eliminates a class of data quality problems endemic to manual field reporting – including misspellings, inconsistent text formatting, missing attribute fields, and improper dropdown or category selections – by replacing free-form human data entry with structured, system-generated outputs tied directly to asset identifiers and flight metadata. This improvement in upstream data quality compounds the value of downstream analytics, as AI and change-detection models perform more reliably on consistently structured inputs.

ComEd’s Advanced Image Analytics program, launched in 2022 and documented at Utility Analytics Week 2024, uses computer vision AI to automatically detect anomalies in drone imagery of distribution assets such as poles, insulators, and transformers, supporting a shift from reactive to predictive maintenance[5].

ORNL’s AIMS (Autonomous Intelligent Measurement Sensors and systems) project, funded by DOE’s Office of Electricity, demonstrates the full-stack integration approach: grid sensors trigger autonomous drone dispatch, multi-sensor inspection covering RF, thermal, acoustic, and visual data, real-time livestreaming, and automated comparison against DOE’s Grid Event Signature Library, enabling maintenance triage without direct human involvement in the sensor-to-decision loop[1].

4

Wildfire Risk Management

The 2018 Camp Fire was ignited by a failed C-hook on a PG&E transmission line in Butte County, California. The equipment failure was attributed to inadequate inspection and resulted in 85 deaths and approximately $16 billion in damage. Drone inspections capable of identifying corroded hardware, damaged insulators, and conductor wear at high resolution provide a materially superior risk management tool relative to helicopter flybys or ground patrols for wildfire-prone corridors[6].

Technology Readiness Level (TRL)

TRL
8

Commercial drone platforms operating under FAA Part 107 VLOS for T&D inspection are at TRL 8: multiple U.S. utilities, including NYSEG, PG&EDominion Energy, Florida Power & Light, Duke Energy, and ComEd, have demonstrated scaled, repeatable operational deployments, which corresponds to TRL 8 [7][8][9].

Adoption Readiness Level (ARL)

Value Proposition

Delivered Cost

Low Risk

Drone inspection is cost-competitive with, and documented to be less expensive than, incumbent alternatives for most T&D applications on a commercial scale. EPRI research and Duke Energy UAV trial data report 40-70% labor reductions depending on site type. Enterprise-class multi-rotor inspection platforms, including the Skydio X10 and Inspired Flight IF800, are priced in the range of approximately $10,000 to $30,000 per unit. Full LiDAR-equipped systems, drone plus sensor, typically run from $30,000 to $50,000 depending on sensor specification. These capital costs amortize across a large number of inspection cycles given the documented labor displacement achieved per flight[2].

Functionality Performance

Low Risk

Drone inspection provides documented functional superiority over incumbent methods on the metrics relevant to utilities: inspection speed, data standardization through repeatable flight paths, worker safety through elimination of tower climbs and energized zone entry for data collection, and anomaly detection sensitivity through thermal imaging and AI analytics. EPRI conducted field tests confirming that selected commercial drone platforms operate without behavioral anomaly in energized environments at 138kV/500A fields[2].

ORNL demonstrated multi-sensor fusion covering thermal, acoustic, RF, and visual data with real-time AI analysis as a capability that incumbent helicopter or ground-crew methods cannot replicate[1].

Ease of Use/Complexity

Medium Risk

FAA Part 107 requires an initial aeronautical knowledge test and biennial recurrent training, with no prior flight or aviation experience needed[9]. The regulatory pathway is straightforward, but the real complexity lies in data analytics and data management. Drone imagery and LiDAR data require processing through AI and computer-vision platforms to produce georeferenced defect reports and integrate outputs with GIS, AMS, and work-order systems. Large file sizes create storage and transfer challenges, and raw datasets often lose value when they are not integrated into accessible tools like GIS, leading to siloed data that stakeholders cannot easily use. ComEd’s program, documented at Utility Analytics Week 2024, highlights that building these capabilities requires substantial investment and is not plug-and-play for organizations without strong data-science infrastructure.

Market Acceptance

Demand Maturity/Market Openness

Low Risk

NYSEG and RG&E deployed drones for Comprehensive Visual Inspection (CVI) across thousands of miles of transmission lines in 2024. Duke Energy, ComEd, and multiple California IOUs have active, scaled programs[7].

California’s mandatory Wildfire Mitigation Plans (WMPs), required under Senate Bill 901 (2018) and reviewed annually by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety (Energy Safety), explicitly include asset inspection programs as a required mitigation activity. This regulatory requirement creates a durable, non-discretionary demand signal for systematic inspection programs among California IOUs[8].

Market Size

Low Risk

The U.S. grid encompasses 240,000 miles of high-voltage transmission lines and 5.5 million miles of local distribution lines with over 180 million power poles, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers 2025 Report Card for America’s Energy. Utilities spent $27.7 billion on transmission and $50.9 billion on distribution infrastructure in 2023, per EIA financial reporting data. This infrastructure requires mandatory, recurring inspection under NERC reliability standards and state regulatory requirements[9].

Downstream Value Chain

Medium Risk

The value chain is functional: drone manufacturers (Skydio, Inspired Flight, Freefly post-DJI disruption), drone service providers (Cyberhawk, specialized utility UAS firms), data analytics platforms (Optelos, Percepto, proprietary utility platforms), and utilities as end operators.

The medium risk reflects the fragmented data standards and limited interoperability. Inspection data formats, defect taxonomy, and AI model outputs are not standardized across the industry. Drone-derived inspection data is conventionally integrated with GIS, and in some cases AMS, but typically not with SCADA. Because no industry standards exist, each deployment requires custom integration work, as seen in the ComED case study. Additionally, the DJI/FCC Covered List action has fragmented the hardware ecosystem, requiring value chain participants to retool for new platforms with different software ecosystems, APIs, and accessories[10].

Resource Maturity

Capital Flow

Low Risk

Drone platform acquisition and software licensing fall within utility O&M budget authority and do not require capital project approval at grid-investment scale. Documented savings from deployed programs generate positive ROI cases that are internally tractable for utility budget cycles. No structural financing gap has been identified in the literature[5].

Project Development, Integration, and Management

Medium Risk

Part 107 VLOS inspection programs are operationally mature at leading utilities. Duke Energy, ComEd, NYSEG, and California IOUs have documented repeatable programs with defined protocols, trained pilots, and established data pipelines[7]. Proven training resources and platform-management workflows are also enabling small and midsize utilities to build and scale their own programs, allowing them to realize similar safety, cost, and efficiency benefits which are an important driver of broader market adoption.

The medium risk applies to utilities building programs from scratch to BVLOS program development which requires new operational protocols and FAA operational area approvals under the proposed Part 108 framework, and to ORNL AIMS-style fully autonomous inspection systems which have been demonstrated at prototype level but not yet commercially deployed at scale by any U.S. utility[1].

Infrastructure

Low Risk

Drone inspections require no new large-scale physical infrastructure. Platforms operate in existing airspace over existing T&D rights-of-way. Cellular and wireless communications networks are adequate for current VLOS data transmission, with drones livestreaming inspection data in real time as demonstrated in ORNL’s EPB of Chattanooga pilot[1].

Drone docking and automated charging stations are a commercially available complementary infrastructure element, offered by companies including Percepto and Skydio, that enable persistent remote deployment without requiring a pilot to physically recover the aircraft after each mission. This represents an additional capital investment item for utilities pursuing autonomous or semi-autonomous persistent monitoring rather than scheduled crewed inspection flights.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain

Medium Risk

DJI, historically the dominant provider of inspection-grade multi-rotor platforms for the utility sector, was effectively excluded from the U.S. market when the FCC added foreign-manufactured drones to its Covered List on December 23, 2025, pursuant to the FY2025 NDAA mechanism. Existing DJI fleets continue to operate; the action restricts future procurement and new equipment authorizations rather than grounding current aircraft. Utilities face lifecycle planning risk as hardware ages without a clear upgrade path, and parts and firmware update continuity is uncertain[10].

U.S.-made NDAA-compliant alternatives include Skydio, Inspired Flight, and Freefly are technologically competitive but significantly more expensive than DJI, which affects adoption, especially for smaller utilities. These platforms do not yet fully replicate DJI’s ecosystem maturity, software integration depth, accessories supply chain, and price point for mapping and inspection missions, according to industry assessment of the transition[11].

Skydio’s supply chain was further disrupted in October 2024, when China sanctioned the company and halted battery shipments from its primary supplier, Dongguan Poweramp (a TDK subsidiary), forcing rationing and underscoring remaining dependence on China-based components[12].

Materials Sourcing

Medium Risk

Drone platforms depend on lithium-ion batteries, rare earth permanent magnets for brushless motors, and semiconductor components with geographic concentration in China and Taiwan. The Skydio battery supply chain disruption of October 2024 provides a documented example of how geopolitical friction can translate into immediate operational constraints for U.S. drone programs[12].

Battery energy density also imposes an operational constraint on mission range. Enterprise inspection-class platforms such as the Skydio X10 offer up to approximately 40 minutes of flight time per charge. The DJI Matrice 350 RTK advertises up to 55 minutes, though real-world flight times with sensor payloads are lower. These limits constrain BVLOS mission range per sortie until energy density improves or alternative power sources mature[13].

Workforce

Medium Risk

FAA Part 107 certification requires passing an initial aeronautical knowledge test, with no prior flight experience required, and biennial recurrent online training to maintain currency. The testing infrastructure and training resources are well-established, and the certified commercial drone pilot workforce has grown substantially since Part 107 took effect in 2016[14].

The binding workforce constraint is in the data analytics and software integration domain: skills to configure, validate, and improve AI/computer vision defect detection models, and to integrate UAS data outputs with utility SCADA/GIS/AMS systems. These are not utility-sector-specific and compete with demand across the broader technology economy. EPRI explicitly identifies the need for both operational UAS pilots and data specialists with AI/ML capabilities as a workforce development requirement for T&D inspection programs[2].

License to Operate

Regulatory Environment

Low Risk

FAA Part 107 is well-established and operationally understood for VLOS inspection. The BVLOS regulatory pathway is clearly positive: the FAA published the Part 108 NPRM on August 7, 2025, with a 60-day comment period that closed October 6, 2025, receiving over 3,000 public comments. A final rule is expected Spring 2026, with implementation 6-12 months thereafter. Part 108 proposes replacing the current per-flight waiver system with operational area approvals, under which routine flights within an approved corridor would not require individual authorization[15].

Policy Environment

Low Risk

President Trump’s Executive Order ‘Unleashing American Drone Dominance,’ issued June 6, 2025, directed the FAA to publish a BVLOS NPRM within 30 days and a final rule within 240 days of the order, and to establish clear performance metrics for BVLOS safety assessment. The FAA published Part 108 NPRM on August 7, 2025, within the directed timeline[11].

California’s mandatory Wildfire Mitigation Plans, required under Senate Bill 901 (2018) and reviewed annually by the CPUC and the Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety, include asset inspection programs as a required mitigation activity. This creates durable regulatory pull for drone inspection programs as a component of IOU risk management[8].

Permitting & Siting

Low Risk

Airborne inspection of existing T&D rights-of-way requires no land-use permitting. The FAA’s Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability (LAANC) system provides near-real-time automated airspace authorization for Part 107 operations in most geographies. Under the proposed Part 108 framework, operational area approvals would replace per-flight waivers for BVLOS, enabling routine operations within approved corridors[14].

Environmental & Safety

Low Risk

Drone inspection operations carry no hazardous materials. EPRI conducted field testing confirming that selected commercial drone platforms, including the Skydio X10 series, operate without behavioral anomaly in energized environments at 138kV/500A fields, validating electromagnetic compatibility for close-proximity T&D inspection. Drone collision risk for crewed aviation in shared airspace is the primary safety concern addressed through Part 108’s proposed detect-and-avoid requirements[2].

Community Perception

Low Risk

Drone inspections of overhead T&D infrastructure along existing rights-of-way generally face low community opposition, and California IOU Wildfire Mitigation Plans reviewed by the CPUC document these programs as standard practice without identifying community acceptance as a material risk[8]. However, some pushbacks have occurred in urban and suburban areas where drones are more visible and privacy concerns are heightened. Adjacent industries such as insurance and home inspection have seen similar concerns, and these perceptions can spill over into the utility context. While these issues have not resulted in significant barriers to program deployment, they are worth noting as part of broader stakeholder sensitivity around privacy and aerial data collection.

Case Studies & Implementation

ORNL AIMS (Autonomous Intelligent Measurement Sensors and systems), DOE Office of Electricity, 2024

ORNL developed an automated drone inspection system in which grid sensors trigger autonomous UAV dispatch, multi-drone coordination covering RF, thermal, acoustic, and visual sensors, and real-time decision support against DOE’s Grid Event Signature Library, eliminating direct human involvement in the sensor-to-inspection loop. Demonstrated at EPB of Chattanooga’s training facility.

https://www.ornl.gov/news/protecting-electric-grid-health-drone-based-power-line-inspection

NYSEG / RG&E Comprehensive Visual Inspection (2024)

New York State Electric & Gas and Rochester Gas and Electric deployed drones for Comprehensive Visual Inspection (CVI) across thousands of miles of transmission lines, identifying damage and wear invisible from ground level without requiring scaffolding or access equipment.

https://www.nyseg.com/w/nyseg-and-rg-e-using-drone-technology-to-inspect-transmission-lines

Large Western U.S. Utility Drone Inspection Scale-Up (documented by Cyberhawk)

A major western U.S. utility initiated a targeted drone inspection program combining CVI with LiDAR, thermal imaging, and corona detection in a high-outage service area. After identifying root causes and achieving over $1.1 million in annual savings, the utility expanded the program across its wider territory.

https://www.suasnews.com/2021/07/cyberhawks-expert-drone-based-inspection-provides-utilities-an-enhanced-approach-to-wildfire-mitigation/

California IOU UAS Cost Savings

A major California IOU reported $180 million in cumulative savings from its UAS programs, driven by accurate pole condition assessment avoiding unnecessary replacements, and a 25% reduction in vegetation management costs through elimination of unnecessary truck rolls.

https://www.distributech.com/industry-news/uas-tech-revolutionizing-utility-inspections

References

  1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Protecting electric grid health with drone-based power line inspection, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity (AIMS project), 2024.
  2. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Automated Visual Line Inspections, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. Product 3002028093, 2023.
  3. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Automation, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA. Product 3002016958, 2022.
  4. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Accelerating Transmission and Distribution (T&D) Inspections with Drones and Artificial Intelligence, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 2021.
  5. Optelos, Utility Analytics Week 2024 Recap: Focus On Drone Inspection And AI Technology In Utilities, 2024.
  6. Utility Dive, An FAA rule will revolutionize energy infrastructure inspections. It just got a big boost, 2025.
  7. New York State Electric & Gas (NYSEG) / Rochester Gas and Electric (RG&E), NYSEG and RG&E Using Drone Technology to Inspect Transmission Lines, 2024.
  8. C. P. U. C. (CPUC), Utility Wildfire Mitigation Plans (mandate under Senate Bill 901, 2018), 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/wildfires/utility-wildfire-mitigation-plans.
  9. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Grid infrastructure investments drive increase in utility spending over last two decades, 2024.
  10. F. C. Commission, FCC Takes Action to Protect National Security by Adding Foreign-Made Drones to its Covered List, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-takes-action-protect-national-security-adding-foreign-made-drones.
  11. UAV Coach, The DJI Ban: Everything You Need to Know, 2026.
  12. TechCrunch, US drone maker Skydio faces battery squeeze after Chinese sanctions, 2024.
  13. UAV Coach, Powerline Inspection Drones: An In-Depth Guide (Skydio X10 up to 40 min; DJI Matrice 350 RTK up to 55 min without payload), 2026.
  14. F. A. A. (FAA), 14 CFR Part 107 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems; Become a Certificated Remote Pilot, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/become_a_drone_pilot.
  15. F. A. A. (FAA), Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Part 108: Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations, 2025. [Online].

If you have any updates or would like to suggest a new technology, please let us know by filling out this form.